Syntax

call(function, ...args)

Calls a function with the provided arguments.

Function values cannot be called directly and can only be executed with call().

f = (_(x) -> x + 1);
val = call(f, 12);
val == 13

call() can also invoke functions by name.

f(x) -> x + 1;
val = call('f', 12);

call() resolves function names from the call site.

Passing function references

In case a function is defined by its name, Scarpet will attempt to resolve its definition in the given module and its imports, meaning if the call is in a imported library, and not in the main module of your app, and that function is not visible from the library perspective, but in the app, it won’t be call-able. In case you pass a function name to a separate module in your app, it should import back that method from the main module for visibility.

Check an example of a problematic code of a library that expects a function value as a passed argument and how it is called in the parent app:

//app.sc
import('lib', 'callme');
foo(x) -> x*x;
test() -> callme('foo' , 5);
//lib.scl
callme(fun, arg) -> call(fun, arg);

In this case 'foo' will fail to dereference in lib as it is not visible by name. In tightly coupled modules, where lib is just a component of your app you can use circular import to acknowledge the symbol from the other module (pretty much like imports in Java classes), and that solves the issue but makes the library dependent on the main app:

//lib.scl
import('app','foo');
callme(fun, arg) -> call(fun, arg);

You can circumvent that issue by explicitly dereferencing the local function where it is used as a lambda argument created in the module in which the requested function is visible:

//app.sc
import('lib', 'callme');
foo(x) -> x*x;
test() -> callme(_(x) -> foo(x), 5);
//lib.scl
callme(fun, arg) -> call(fun, arg);

Or by passing an explicit reference to the function, instead of calling it by name:

//app.sc
import('lib', 'callme');
global_foohandler = (foo(x) -> x*x);
test() -> callme(global_foohandler, 5);

Little technical note: the use of _ in expression passed to built in functions is much more efficient due to not creating new call stacks for each invoked function, but anonymous functions is the only mechanism available for programmers with their own lambda arguments

my_map(list, function) -> map(list, call(function, _));
my_map([1,2,3], _(x) -> x*x);    // => [1,4,9]
profile_expr(my_map([1,2,3], _(x) -> x*x));   // => ~32000
sq(x) -> x*x; profile_expr(my_map([1,2,3], 'sq'));   // => ~36000
sq = (_(x) -> x*x); profile_expr(my_map([1,2,3], sq));   // => ~36000
profile_expr(map([1,2,3], _*_));   // => ~80000